hmm i guess this speaks for itself:
Donate $4000
All of the above, plus we'll write an episode in which the characters repeatedly mention your product, brand, or business in a positive light, and are then promptly handed large amounts of money.
I have been falsely thinking this work is trying to get more attention on the false propaganda which advertising is creating. I was wrong, it supports it. haha. Too bad.

toggle Posted by kurt.paulsen 2011-12-18 17:31:51
UpDown
There is a worthwhile premise behind this video. The execution falls short. It's funny enough for 10-15 minutes of material, but it's been stretched to 25. Either things are drawn out unnecessarily, or the same joke is hammered over and over again as if the filmmaker doesn't trust his audience to catch on without a ponderous level of repetition.
The visual depictions of the characters is just bizarre. I was hoping that the 'product heads' or 'object heads' or whatever they are would be cleverly integrated into the stories. For example, the people could have been portrayed as not only marketing products, but creating identities for themselves which are essentially brands that they are marketing within the context of their own work environment. That's not what happened, Some of the symbols were obvious: a light bulb for an 'ideas man', empty suits for empty suits, a surf board for someone representing 'fun' lifestyle, and a phone for someone who mostly networks. Some were less obvious: a camera for a 'creative type' and a thumbtack for a accountant minded person, a cigarette for a neurotic, and a , a bottle opener for the 'partier'. Others had no obvious meaning. Overall it was just distracting. The same message could have been communicated with wardrobe and hairstyle. I think it was a sign of laziness both in terms of the animation and creatively in terms of the character design.